|Date Added:||21 July 2010|
|File Size:||43.80 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Your unreliable tests are probably because of one or both of these.
And similarly, in the main thread, moving from one rspec instruction do a click to another see if page body has content does not happen instantaneously. That should def make it easier to write reliable Capybara tests.
5 Tips for More Effective Capybara Tests – Semaphore
Sign up using Email and Password. Rather than litter js: If only there were a real browser that we could run without the GUI! Do not do this.
You can use the library to drive JS, headless and Selenium, however it is missing the ‘capybara’ shared API between each of the different ‘worlds’.
One easy way of accomplishing this is to use PhantomJS via the Poltergeist gem. I’m testing a similar stack right now.
If you need help setting up your first tests, consider checking out some of my other blog posts on the subject. But Rspec, Capybara, DatabaseCleaner, and Poltegeist have all had at least some known concurrency issues generally with how they all relate to each other in the past.
selenium – Is there a capybara for ? – Stack Overflow
The test framework waits for the ensuring response, and sees if it contains what was expected. Michelle Tilley k 30 I’m a London based Ruby consultant. Using Selenium means that your tests will be running using Firefox. My app-in-hand had some attempts in these directions, but even figuring out if they were working especially for Angular was non-trivial. There are four built in methods. Here are the Ubuntu commands to install xvfb and additional fonts to get rid of some warnings.
This hack is intentionally breaking that.
Jumpstart Lab Curriculum
There are some slight syntactic differences between the way Poltergeist and Selenium handles separate windows, but other than that they are extremely similar.
Is there a capybara for Node. We get almost all the speed of being headless with Rack::